Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for the 105-key ISO physical keyboard layout? #61

Open
devurandom opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Support for the 105-key ISO physical keyboard layout? #61

devurandom opened this issue Sep 15, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@devurandom
Copy link

Is there a variant of Workman for 105-key ISO keyboards? If not, since the keyboard has one key more than the 104-key ANSI keyboard, will that key be dead?

For comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#/media/File:Physical_keyboard_layouts_comparison_ANSI_ISO_KS_ABNT_JIS.png

devurandom added a commit to devurandom/tuxedocomputers-keyboard-layouts that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2020
Since an official Workman layout for ISO keyboards does not exist,
the extra key in the lower left carries the same characters as on
the en-US ISO keyboard layout.

See-also: workman-layout/Workman#61
devurandom added a commit to devurandom/tuxedocomputers-keyboard-layouts that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2020
Since an official Workman layout for ISO keyboards does not exist,
the extra key in the lower left carries the same characters as on
the en-US ISO keyboard layout.

See-also: workman-layout/Workman#61
References: https://workmanlayout.org/
vinzv pushed a commit to tuxedocomputers/keyboard-layouts that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2021
Since an official Workman layout for ISO keyboards does not exist,
the extra key in the lower left carries the same characters as on
the en-US ISO keyboard layout.

See-also: workman-layout/Workman#61
References: https://workmanlayout.org/
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant