You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently downloaded the CTF Static (Cluster-level aggregates only) data.csv from the CLIAR UAT database. Based on the file name, I assume it is intended to include only cluster-level aggregate values (e.g., means). However, I noticed that the file also contains non-aggregate indicator values. For example, when family_name is "Social Institutions," there are non-aggregate values for wjp_rol_e_7.
I’m concerned that this mixture of data might be challenging for users to identify and could potentially lead to inaccuracies in aggregate-level analysis if not addressed.
Does this align with how the file is expected to be structured? Please feel free to share your thoughts or let me know if further clarification is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I recently downloaded the CTF Static (Cluster-level aggregates only) data.csv from the CLIAR UAT database. Based on the file name, I assume it is intended to include only cluster-level aggregate values (e.g., means). However, I noticed that the file also contains non-aggregate indicator values. For example, when family_name is "Social Institutions," there are non-aggregate values for wjp_rol_e_7.
I’m concerned that this mixture of data might be challenging for users to identify and could potentially lead to inaccuracies in aggregate-level analysis if not addressed.
Does this align with how the file is expected to be structured? Please feel free to share your thoughts or let me know if further clarification is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: