Skip to content

Custom operators to implement an unaccented name-search feature #307

Answered by woylie
linusdm asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Currently, custom fields are the only way to implement this.

There was an idea about derived fields before, but that's tricky to implement. You can find some thoughts on this here and here. In the proposal, you would only be able to supply the fragment for the field, while the operator and value would be set by Flop.

If you also need to convert the value in some way, either in the DB or in the application, that wouldn't suffice, though. For that, you'd need to extend the operators indeed. That wasn't on the roadmap so far, but I'm open for proposals.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by linusdm
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants