-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check which input particle types makes sense to include #1357
Comments
I tested SHIELDHIT-12A on proton pencil beam example with all available particles. All particles gave results which looked fine, with the following excepions:
I tested Fluka on colimator input file. This time the exceptions were:
|
Can you check "fluence" without any filters for pi0 ?
That is expected, we should exclude photons (gamma radiation) from input particle list for SHIELD-HIT12A. This simulator code cannot handle transport of photons.
That was expected. One should check as well "fluence" without any filter. I would expect some results there.
All heavy ions should go as input particles for SH12A.
That means that pion0, gamma and muons are to be included in input particle list for Fluka. It is expected that "proton fluence" is zero. |
I removed all filters from all detectors on proton pencil beam example, still no results for pi0. All plots are empty, all scalar results are 0.
Fluence without filters gave normal results for these particles. |
@Bogdan2423 can you make a PR which removes unsupported particles for SHIELD-HIT12A ? |
Shouldn't we wait until we have the option to select the simulator in the editor? If I did it now I would have to remove these particles from both SHIELD-HIT12A and Fluka. Unless we want to add them back for Fluka later |
As for now remove unsupported SHIELD-HIT12A particles. |
Probably some of the won't work, some of them may not be useful at all (say neutrinos?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: