You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently QDYN internally generates a mesh, except for 3D MPI simulations. Since the Python wrapper already pre-computes a mesh with default settings, we might as well shift the burden from FORTRAN to Python/Matlab, and always read the mesh from the input file.
To-do
Verify that the default mesh generator in Python outputs the same results as the one in FORTRAN
Create Python routines for standard fault configurations
Create an internal check that the along-strike direction is co-linear for each row of the mesh, and that the number of elements in that direction is an integer power of 2 (both are required by the FFT)
Design an integration test for an unambiguous fault geometry (i.e. mesh in == mesh out)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently QDYN internally generates a mesh, except for 3D MPI simulations. Since the Python wrapper already pre-computes a mesh with default settings, we might as well shift the burden from FORTRAN to Python/Matlab, and always read the mesh from the input file.
To-do
Create an internal check that the along-strike direction is co-linear for each row of the mesh, and that the number of elements in that direction is an integer power of 2 (both are required by the FFT)Design an integration test for an unambiguous fault geometry (i.e. mesh in == mesh out)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: