-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
side improvement isn't side-refinement ? #3
Comments
@hcnhatnam 感谢指正,已更正;翻译为"侧边细化" |
@hcnhatnam 我的实现逻辑不是这样的;Ground Truth本身也做了分割;如果一个GT的x轴坐标[x1,x2]分别为[5.3,68.7],则会被分割(spilt)为如下5个GT: [5.3,16.] 、[16.,32.]、[32.,48.]、[48.,64]、 [64.,68.7] ;对于匹配中间3个GT的anchors,side-refinement 回归目标为0;只有匹配左右两边的gt才有side-refinement 回归目标;分别为 |
sorry but Ground Truth is[x1,y1,x2,y2] why Ground Truth is [5.3,68.7]?i don't understand |
@hcnhatnam 对, Ground Truth是四边形,坐标为[lt_x, lt_y, rt_x, rt_y, rb_x, rb_y, lb_x, lb_y];side-refinement只与x轴坐标相关,所以省略了y轴坐标 |
i understaned.I really appreciate you.But i think dx= ((64.+68.7)-(64+70))/16 not 72 |
@hcnhatnam 应该是dx= ((64.+68.7)-(64+80))/16 ;(* ̄︶ ̄) |
ohh... ok ok |
@yizt I think you were a bit confused.
|
@hcnhatnam 你说的没错;这里的实现不是完全按照论文中的逻辑。 |
Hi @yizt, |
@NamNguyenThanh 感谢您的反馈!有两个方面原因: |
I think side improvement isn't side-refinement in paper
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: