Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor problem #19

Open
voldemortX opened this issue Feb 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Minor problem #19

voldemortX opened this issue Feb 12, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@voldemortX
Copy link

weighted_prob = pred_prob/cls_thresh

Division by thresholds first does have a very small chance to change the following argmax results.
e.g. A pixel with 2 classes has softmax result as [0.89, 0.11], but the thresholds so happens to be [0.9, 0.09], then it will satisfy weighted_prob > 1, but it is not even predicted as class 2.
Maybe this is indeed the original intent of the paper, but I'll just point it out here.
I call this minor problem because the example above is very unlikely to happen in actual training.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant