You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently chore priorities are framed in "points per thousand". This is advantageous since it is a constant metric, independent of the number of people in the workspace. However, it is disadvantageous since for large or small workspaces, the number may be very different from the amount of points a chore receives in a month.
Explore the pros & cons of replacing "points per thousand" with "points per month".
Pros:
Number is more consistent with the mental math of "how many points is the chore worth to me"
Cons:
Number will vary as users join and leave the workspace, and between workspaces, causing potential confusion
Number lacks well-known analogue, in this case "permille"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently chore priorities are framed in "points per thousand". This is advantageous since it is a constant metric, independent of the number of people in the workspace. However, it is disadvantageous since for large or small workspaces, the number may be very different from the amount of points a chore receives in a month.
Explore the pros & cons of replacing "points per thousand" with "points per month".
Pros:
Cons:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: