You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discovered in #55, there is a bug surrounding sorting and grouping. Taking the Nobelists demo as a sample, multiple sorts will start to show some sub-groups as children of their sibling order instead of siblings, and some sub-groups will simply be missing. The algorithm for generating these does not appear to be entirely correct.
Note that the changes that temporarily fixed #55 should be backed out once this is repaired; they will be unnecessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This change is too aggressive given the default on ordered views is to use grouping. Anybody sorting by label is going to get something of a surprise with this change. Backing out d3e1f08 and going back to the fix used in #55 for now. A better solution probably involves using a hybrid, keeping things as they are when only one level of sorting is used, breaking out one item as a group behavior when more than one level of sorting is used.
As discovered in #55, there is a bug surrounding sorting and grouping. Taking the Nobelists demo as a sample, multiple sorts will start to show some sub-groups as children of their sibling order instead of siblings, and some sub-groups will simply be missing. The algorithm for generating these does not appear to be entirely correct.
Note that the changes that temporarily fixed #55 should be backed out once this is repaired; they will be unnecessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: