Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🚨 [security] Update sinatra: 2.2.0 → 2.2.4 (patch) #271

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

🚨 [security] Update sinatra: 2.2.0 → 2.2.4 (patch) #271

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Dec 18, 2022

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ sinatra (2.2.0 → 2.2.4) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Sinatra vulnerable to Reflected File Download attack

An issue was discovered in Sinatra 2.0 before 2.2.3 and 3.0 before 3.0.4.
An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that
sets the Content-Disposition header of a response when the filename is
derived from user-supplied input.

Release Notes

2.2.3 (from changelog)

  • Fix: Escape filename in the Content-Disposition header. #1841 by Kunpei Sakai

  • Fix: fixed ReDoS for Rack::Protection::IPSpoofing. #1823 by @ooooooo-q

2.2.2 (from changelog)

  • Update mustermann dependency to version 2.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

✳️ rack (2.2.3 → 2.2.4) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing

There is a possible denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing
component of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2022-30122.

Versions Affected: >= 1.2
Not affected: < 1.2
Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1

Impact

Carefully crafted multipart POST requests can cause Rack's multipart parser to
take much longer than expected, leading to a possible denial of service
vulnerability.

Impacted code will use Rack's multipart parser to parse multipart posts. This
includes directly using the multipart parser like this:

params = Rack::Multipart.parse_multipart(env)

But it also includes reading POST data from a Rack request object like this:

p request.POST # read POST data
p request.params # reads both query params and POST data

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

🚨 Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack

There is a possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in the Lint
and CommonLogger components of Rack. This vulnerability has been assigned the
CVE identifier CVE-2022-30123.

Versions Affected: All.
Not affected: None
Fixed Versions: 2.0.9.1, 2.1.4.1, 2.2.3.1

Impact

Carefully crafted requests can cause shell escape sequences to be written to
the terminal via Rack's Lint middleware and CommonLogger middleware. These
escape sequences can be leveraged to possibly execute commands in the victim's
terminal.

Impacted applications will have either of these middleware installed, and
vulnerable apps may have something like this:

use Rack::Lint

Or

use Rack::CommonLogger

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

Remove these middleware from your application

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 18 commits:

↗️ mustermann (indirect, 1.1.1 → 2.0.2) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 64 commits:

↗️ rack-protection (indirect, 2.2.0 → 2.2.4) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.2.3 (from changelog)

  • Fix: Escape filename in the Content-Disposition header. #1841 by Kunpei Sakai

  • Fix: fixed ReDoS for Rack::Protection::IPSpoofing. #1823 by @ooooooo-q

2.2.2 (from changelog)

  • Update mustermann dependency to version 2.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

↗️ tilt (indirect, 2.0.10 → 2.0.11) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.0.11 (from changelog)

  • Fix #extensions_for for RedcarpetTemplate (judofyr)
  • Support the new sass-embedded gem (#367, ntkme)
  • Add Tilt::EmacsOrg support (#366, hacktivista)
  • Improve rendering of BasicObject instances (#348, jeremyevans)
  • Fix Ruby 3.0 compatibility (#360, voxik)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 23 commits:

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Dec 18, 2022
@depfu depfu bot mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
depfu
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants