-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 264
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimizing the fee estimation calculation interface. #3510
Open
ssun0121
wants to merge
61
commits into
release/2.0.0
Choose a base branch
from
feature/calculate-fee
base: release/2.0.0
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
ssun0121
commented
Jan 19, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- For issue Optimizing the interface for fee calculation. #3511
- Optimize calculate fee interface.
…onEnabled and GetTokenIssuerAndOwnerModificationEnabled
Token contract supports the token issuer modifying the token's issuer and owner
…rAndOwnerModificationDisabled and adjust GetTokenIssuerAndOwnerModificationEnabled return value
Fix: improve semantic accuracy
Release v1.6.1
Pull request analysis by VIZIPI Below you will find who is the most qualified team member to review your code. Reviewers with knowledge related to these changes
Potential missing files from this Pull requestfiles commonly committed with a subset of this pr, but not committed this time. (click to collapse)
Committed file ranks(click to expand)97.90% [...contract/AElf.Contracts.MultiToken/TokenContract_NFT_Acti] 98.37% [...contract/AElf.Contracts.MultiToken/TokenContractConstants] 98.76% [test/AElf.Contracts.Profit.Tests/ProfitTests.cs] 99.77% [contract/AElf.Contracts.Profit/ProfitContract.cs] 99.97% [protobuf/token_contract.proto] 90.32% [...contract/AElf.Contracts.MultiToken/TokenContract_NFTHelpe] 99.04% [...test/AElf.Contracts.MultiToken.Tests/BVT/TokenApplication] 97.45% [...test/AElf.Contracts.Election.Tests/Full/ReleaseProfitsFro] 74.50% [...test/AElf.Contracts.Profit.Tests/ProfitContractTestConsta] 94.40% [...test/AElf.Contracts.MultiToken.Tests/BVT/NftApplicationTe] |
vizipi
bot
requested review from
jason-aelf,
zhxymh,
gldeng and
zhifenglee-aelf
January 19, 2024 03:43
Release v1.7.0
…restriction feat:remove nft decimal restriction
…d-chain' into feature/create-token-on-specified-chain
…cified-chain Create token on specified chain
…ure/batch-approve
Token contract support batch approve
…te-token-on-specified-chain # Conflicts: # contract/AElf.Contracts.MultiToken/TokenContractConstants.cs
…cified-chain Enhance compatibility with historical NFT creation
Release v1.8.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.