Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regarding the release PR for aelf project version 1.12.0 #3630

Open
wants to merge 87 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chopin-fan
Copy link
Collaborator

For Issue: #3612
For issue #3619
For issue #3610

chopin-fan and others added 30 commits September 3, 2024 08:36
2. Add an execution limit for inline transactions
3. Improve compatibility in inline method validation.
chopin-fan and others added 24 commits November 27, 2024 16:18
…optimize

Transaction status result optimization
…ion-time

Extend seed NFT expiration time
TransactionResult optimization
…optimize

Merge pull request #3626 from AElfProject/dev
…status-modify

update StatusV2 to StatusWithBVP
Copy link

vizipi bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Pull request analysis by VIZIPI

Below you will find who is the most qualified team member to review your code.
This analysis includes his/her work on the code included in this Pull request, in addition to their experience in code affected by these changes ( partly found within the list of potential missing files below )   Feedback always welcome

Reviewers with knowledge related to these changes

Match % Person Commit Count Common Files
60.71% eanzhao 116 34
57.14% dongqiangaelf 26 32
55.36% gldeng 54 31
48.21% jason-hoopox 118 27
42.86% ZhangXin 113 24
25.00% louis.li 59 14

Potential missing files from this Pull request

No commonly committed files found with a 40% threashold


Committed file ranks

(click to expand)
  • 51.92%[...test/AElf.Kernel.Core.Tests/Extensions/TransactionExtensi]
  • 58.37%[...src/AElf.Sdk.CSharp.Internal/AElf.Sdk.CSharp.Internal.csp]
  • 0.00%[src/AElf.Runtime.CSharp/TransactionConsts.cs]
  • 90.80%[global.json]
  • 98.57%[AElf.All.sln]
  • 99.38%[...contract/AElf.Contracts.Consensus.AEDPoS/AEDPoSContract_P]
  • 95.99%[...src/AElf.CSharp.CodeOps/Validators/Whitelist/IWhitelistPr]
  • 82.87%[src/AElf.Runtime.CSharp.Core/ContractCodeLoadContext.cs]
  • 97.66%[...src/AElf.Kernel.SmartContract/AElf.Kernel.SmartContract.c]
  • 99.32%[test/AElf.Sdk.CSharp.Tests/AElf.Sdk.CSharp.Tests.csproj]
  • Copy link

    codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

    Codecov Report

    Attention: Patch coverage is 88.37209% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

    Project coverage is 73.56%. Comparing base (88d4e10) to head (586a98a).
    Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

    Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
    ...AElf.Contracts.MultiToken/TokenContract_Actions.cs 70.83% 7 Missing ⚠️
    src/AElf.Sdk.CSharp.Internal/InternalBuiltIns.cs 85.71% 5 Missing ⚠️
    ...ps/Validators/Module/ContractStructureValidator.cs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
    src/AElf.Types/Types/BigIntValue.cs 97.05% 1 Missing ⚠️

    ❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (88d4e10) and HEAD (586a98a). Click for more details.

    HEAD has 26 uploads less than BASE
    Flag BASE (88d4e10) HEAD (586a98a)
    36 10
    Additional details and impacted files

    Impacted file tree graph

    @@             Coverage Diff             @@
    ##           master    #3630       +/-   ##
    ===========================================
    - Coverage   90.53%   73.56%   -16.97%     
    ===========================================
      Files         677      678        +1     
      Lines       26104    26226      +122     
      Branches     2353     2358        +5     
    ===========================================
    - Hits        23634    19294     -4340     
    - Misses       2355     6779     +4424     
    - Partials      115      153       +38     
    Flag Coverage Δ
    ?

    Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

    Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
    ...DPoS/AEDPoSContract_ProcessConsensusInformation.cs 80.43% <100.00%> (-0.27%) ⬇️
    ...CSharp.CodeOps/Validators/Method/ArrayValidator.cs 95.17% <100.00%> (ø)
    ...CodeOps/Validators/Whitelist/IWhitelistProvider.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
    ...Application/IExecutionObserverThresholdProvider.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
    ...Elf.Runtime.CSharp.Core/ContractCodeLoadContext.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
    src/AElf.Sdk.CSharp/CSharpSmartContractAbstract.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
    src/AElf.Sdk.CSharp/CSharpSmartContractContext.cs 76.15% <100.00%> (-2.61%) ⬇️
    ...tion.Chain/Services/TransactionResultAppService.cs 0.00% <ø> (-100.00%) ⬇️
    src/AElf.Types/Types/BigIntValue.cs 63.56% <97.05%> (+37.25%) ⬆️
    ...ps/Validators/Module/ContractStructureValidator.cs 82.68% <0.00%> (-0.94%) ⬇️
    ... and 2 more

    ... and 145 files with indirect coverage changes

    @@ -200,6 +200,12 @@ private void WhitelistAElfTypes(Whitelist whitelist)
    // Selectively allowed types and members
    .Namespace("AElf.Cryptography.SecretSharing", Permission.Denied, type => type
    .Type(typeof(SecretSharingHelper), Permission.Denied, member => member
    .Member(nameof(SecretSharingHelper.DecodeSecret), Permission.Allowed)));
    .Member(nameof(SecretSharingHelper.DecodeSecret), Permission.Allowed)
    .Member(nameof(SecretSharingHelper.Ed25519Verify), Permission.Allowed)
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    add a new helper,not SecretSharingHelper

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants