Remove wurlitzer dependency #2423
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When using the Python interface, we don't rely on C(++) output anywhere anymore, and thus, we don't need wurlitzer anymore.
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: pypi/[email protected], pypi/[email protected] |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2423 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 77.60% 77.59% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 324 324
Lines 20913 20902 -11
Branches 1464 1464
===========================================
- Hits 16230 16219 -11
Misses 4680 4680
Partials 3 3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using the Python interface, we don't rely on C(++) output anywhere anymore, and thus, we don't need wurlitzer anymore.
Closes #2409