-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add STL geom_type for EB in Source/InitEB.cpp #771
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8a0bb59
Current version of PeleC does not recognize "stl" as an eb.geom_type.
ejyoo921 de4422f
Clang-format updated
ejyoo921 d733e0e
Merge branch 'development' into EB-stl
ejyoo921 fa47fb4
Back to original Build/cmake.sh
ejyoo921 2abe272
Removed unnecessary comment (line 353) and added the Assert for chkfi…
ejyoo921 5483791
Corrected the typo (default)
ejyoo921 48876e2
I guess we need to test this on Eagle machine
ejyoo921 18b710f
We needed to change the stl test file - still clyinder but re-scaled …
ejyoo921 d388a4b
delted no-use files -- cylinder.stl and eb-c9-cylinder.inp
ejyoo921 2bc34a3
The same cylinder-r50.stl file, but re-exported in Xcode.
ejyoo921 e262274
use cylinder-r50.stl -- input file (eb-c9.inp) has changed.
ejyoo921 afa691c
Recover PelePhysics
ejyoo921 aad99c4
1) Cleaned up stl files that are no use
ejyoo921 eda7f85
documentation for STL capability
baperry2 b7472f2
fix spelling
baperry2 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Binary file not shown.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of a silent comment, maybe we could replace this with an actual Abort? That way we know it breaks loudly and we can always go back and check if amrex accepts it later? Or maybe they never will? Or maybe I have no idea what I am talking about.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The invalid condition gets caught by the AMREX_ALWAYS_ASSERT below. The addFineLevels function isn't supported for chkfile and stl, but it's ok to just skip if no levels are being added. So we catch the error for either of these options only when
max_level != eb_max_level