-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vof #111
base: development
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Vof #111
Conversation
Hi, Dr Tan Hua, I am Yadong. We met earlier in the Gerris-basilisk meeting at Princeton University. I am wondering if there will be a paper about this PR to describe the VOF algorithm later? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updating vof class
Hi Yadong, The vof method I'm planning to implement in AMReX/incflo is going to be same as the method in Gerris/Basilisk. Popinet's 2009 JCP paper details the algorithm. I hope to get most work done by the end of this year. Stay tune. Best, Hua |
Got it! That will be really nice. During my Ph.D., I also carefully read Popinet's 2003 and 2009 JCP paper. Yet our group used the CLSVOF, that is why I did not choose the direction to implement the pure VOF method at that time. The incflo uses the nonsucycling method and the IAMR uses the subcycling method. One thought is if you can make the VOF a standalone feature while combining it with incflow advance functions, maybe I can also learn to combine this feature with IAMR later when it is ready. I am very interested in investigating how the algorithms work in the AMR framework. |
Thank you for your advice, Yadong! Yes, I desire to develop the VOF capability as an add-on class, so the developers of other AMReX platform based software can easily add it to their codes. |
implement surface tension
complete merge with incflo development
… defined in input file
No description provided.