Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PE-D][Tester C] Duplicate persons being added #203

Closed
nus-pe-script opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #208
Closed

[PE-D][Tester C] Duplicate persons being added #203

nus-pe-script opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #208
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation wontfix This will not be worked on
Milestone

Comments

@nus-pe-script
Copy link

Seems that the name being added is case sensitive so it is possible for the user to add in a duplicate person if the name is not exactly the same (ie john would be different from John). This is even when the details of the person remain the same. If users accidentally forget they already added their client and added them again but this time if they maybe changed the case, a duplicate person would be created, which would make managing their contacts harder as they have to deal with duplicates!

Screenshot 2023-11-03 233017.png


Labels: type.FeatureFlaw severity.Medium
original: dhruvir29/ped#15

@sopa301 sopa301 added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 4, 2023
@sopa301 sopa301 added this to the v1.4 milestone Nov 4, 2023
@sopa301 sopa301 self-assigned this Nov 6, 2023
@sopa301 sopa301 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation wontfix This will not be worked on and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 6, 2023
@AlyssaPng AlyssaPng linked a pull request Nov 6, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants