Update deployment guide components and network checks

[morgan-patou]

In relation to the previous PR #589, I split the doc & network checks related improvements/corrections in this new PR.

Included in this PR:

• correction of the documentation and alignment between the doc and the network checks playbook that was available before but not doing all the checks
• addition of some conditions for execution of tasks in the network checks playbook in case it's being executed on Community
• Inclusion of the Alfresco Control Center on the documentation since I saw you pushed it recently into the master branch (c.f. OPSEXP-1645 Add Alfresco control center role #564)
• Inclusion of the Alfresco Control Center on the network checks playbook

Not included in this PR:

• Update of the docs/resources/*.png files. I believe that you generate the png files based on the puml. I suggested in this PR an update of the puml files, but I didn't re-generate the png, as I assume you have what is needed for that while I don't

Feel free to let me know if I need to update/remove something.

[gionn]

• Update of the docs/resources/*.png files. I believe that you generate the png files based on the puml. I suggested in this PR an update of the puml files, but I didn't re-generate the png, as I assume you have what is needed for that while I don't

I've kickstarted #611 to tackle that in an automated fashion, you can rebase if merged soon or we will take care of that later 👍🏻

[gionn]

LGTM

[gionn]

Fix for this failing e2e is already in master

  TASK [Compare host OS with supported matrix] ***********************************
  fatal: [search-enteprise-integration-instance]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": ["Rocky 8.8 is not a supported OS"]}

[alxgomz]

Slight change

[alxgomz]

Why are you calling the role if you include the tasks explicitly?
To be fair, that stuff should not even be a role. If you feel like moving it to the playbook level feel free to do so.
If not, then just remove the roles execution

[morgan-patou]

All the other play of this playbook do that, I simply duplicated the ADW play and changed all adw references with acc, since that seems to be what was required for ACC as well. Isn't that to load the library listen_port.py that is then used inside the check_port.yml task? If that isn't the reason, I do not know, you did it like that for other plays so I just did the same.

[alxgomz]

Oh lord yes you're most likely right. That's a really ugly hack :-/
I've done some quick tests and it seems a single role is needed for the complete set of plays in this playbook to find the module file.
That said, I have created a new ticket to completely get rid of that roles: OPSEXP-2147 (shadows #438)
For now we can move forward with current code in this PR.