ITS tracking: update PbPb params for apass1

[mconcas]

@chiarazampolli : as discussed, I also added the label for apass4 of PbPb 2023 let me know if this does require more work.

[github-actions]

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1

[mconcas]

+async-label async-2024-PbPb-apass1, async-2023-pbpb-apass4

[chiarazampolli]

Ciao @mconcas ,

I think there was a misunderstanding: we should not port this to the PbPb 23 apass4 tag, actually, or it will spoil the MCs anchored to it. So I removed it. This will be taken for any future apass5 of PbPb 23.

Chiara

[chiarazampolli]

Ciao @mconcas ,

There was another PR that I merged which touched the same file. Can you rebase to master? There seems to be no conflicts, but in the "files changed", I don't see the modifications from the other PR:

https://github.com/AliceO2Group/O2DPG/pull/1826/files

Do you know if it is normal? The same is true for https://github.com/AliceO2Group/O2DPG/pull/1828/files, @shahor02 . Maybe I am simply overcareful...

Chiara

[shahor02]

Do you know if it is normal? The same is true for https://github.com/AliceO2Group/O2DPG/pull/1828/files, @shahor02 . Maybe I am simply overcareful...

@chiarazampolli this is because you merged your PR after I've opened mine. If my PR does not show the conflict with master, this means that the rebasing is not really necessary. But I've done it anyway.

[chiarazampolli]

Merged, failures unrelated.

[chiarazampolli]

Hello @shahor02 ,

Thanks! Matteo did not do the rebase, and we now have the evidence that it works :-)

Thanks!

Chiara