Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test merging smithy-codegen to master #2

Closed
wants to merge 574 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

AllanZhengYP
Copy link
Owner

@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP commented Mar 20, 2020

This is replaced by #3

AllanZhengYP and others added 30 commits January 7, 2020 15:10
Must add it back after client-cognito-identity is available

Co-authored-by: awstools <[email protected]>
Changes in this update include:

* Added models for greengrass and mediaconnect.
* Traits that don't match the protocol are preserved.
* XML name and flattened traits are fixed up accoring to the updated
  spec.
* feat: infer endpoint prefix from a map file

* fix: update copy script to override endpoints.ts

* chore: add endpoint functional test cases

* fix: update clients with correct endpoint prefix from C2J
dependabot-preview bot and others added 26 commits March 2, 2020 18:46
* chore: smithy gradle can generated from designated folder

* chore: generate-clients scripts supports globs
* Update streaming member types(smithy-lang/smithy-typescript#138)
* Fix streaming type types when they are required(smithy-lang/smithy-typescript#140)
* Protocol codegen fixes via protocol tests (awslabls/smithy-typescript#141)
* Add support for generating HTTP protocol tests(awslabls/smithy-typescript@6b6a3b182771e00742369e949903087378862ea2)

* chore: update yarn lock
The @aws-crypto/sha256-browser package doesn't work properly in ReactNative. So we use replace it will pure JS hasher(@aws-crypto/sha256-js) instead.
Codegen for smithy-lang/smithy-typescript#144
@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP changed the title Smithy codegen Test merging smithy-codegen to master Mar 20, 2020
@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP reopened this Mar 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants