Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8.8: Don't apply reverse spinning if the cluster is no force gen [ANT-2293] #2468

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

payetvin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JasonMarechal25
Copy link
Contributor

Is it possible to add a test (cucumber or unit) on this behavior ? Ideally We'd like to see it fail before your correction and pass after.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M and removed size/XS labels Nov 6, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
E Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

@payetvin payetvin added this to the Sprint 10 milestone Nov 7, 2024
@payetvin payetvin merged commit c18e628 into release/8.8.x Nov 8, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@payetvin payetvin deleted the fix/8.8-spinning branch November 8, 2024 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants