Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Saam/ec (#1) #241

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

samantehrani
Copy link

  • implement abstract pubk,privk interfaces, implement rsa parity, implement ed25519, implementec_p256k1, add unit tests

  • add erlang/rust compatibility tests

  • implement raw serialization, add identifier (owner) derivation from raw pubkey, add unit tests

  • address feedbacks: more ergonomic type interfaces, avoid input params mutation

  • fix test

  • update interfaces to support new keys/backward compatible

  • add shim for crypto module for older node versions

  • add recover method

  • remove ed15519

  • add tests for recovery

  • remove owner from secp256k1 transactions, modify signature data for secp256k1

  • finalize rsa tests, use new rsa module all around

* implement abstract pubk,privk interfaces, implement rsa parity, implement ed25519, implementec_p256k1, add unit tests

* add erlang/rust compatibility tests

* implement raw serialization, add identifier (owner) derivation from raw pubkey, add unit tests

* address feedbacks: more ergonomic type interfaces, avoid input params mutation

* fix test

* update interfaces to support new keys/backward compatible

* add shim for crypto module for older node versions

* add recover method

* remove ed15519

* add tests for recovery

* remove owner from secp256k1 transactions, modify signature data for secp256k1

* finalize rsa tests, use new rsa module all around
@rosmcmahon
Copy link
Member

rosmcmahon commented Jan 18, 2025

why another new PR? there's no history in this one :-/

@samantehrani samantehrani changed the base branch from master to master-ec January 18, 2025 13:13
@samantehrani
Copy link
Author

closed in favor of #240

@rosmcmahon
Copy link
Member

thanks Saam 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants