Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use CRP defaulter to account for nil CRP policy in eviction controller #987

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

Arvindthiru
Copy link
Contributor

@Arvindthiru Arvindthiru commented Dec 11, 2024

Description of your changes

Fixes #

I have:

  • Run make reviewable to ensure this PR is ready for review.

How has this code been tested

Special notes for your reviewer

@Arvindthiru Arvindthiru changed the title fix: account for nil CRP policy fix: account for nil CRP policy in eviction controller Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelawyu michaelawyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a nit. LGTM.

michaelawyu
michaelawyu previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
@Arvindthiru Arvindthiru changed the title fix: account for nil CRP policy in eviction controller fix: use CRP defaulter to account for nil CRP policy in eviction controller Dec 12, 2024
},
},
},
crp: ptr.To(buildTestPickAllCRP(testCRPName)),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder why sometimes we use this while sometimes we just use testCRP

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

testCRP is only used for validateEviction test where we use defaulter to set default values on the CRP. For all the other tests we can build CRP which doesn't need to have all default values

@Arvindthiru Arvindthiru merged commit 6a43026 into Azure:main Dec 18, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants