Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running time of PTST analysis for Xenium data #306

Open
Ferris01 opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Running time of PTST analysis for Xenium data #306

Ferris01 opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Ferris01
Copy link

Ferris01 commented Jul 18, 2024

Hi developer team,

Thank you for developing this very useful tool. When I run st.spatial.trajectory.pseudotime function with my own Xenium data, which is clustered and annotated manually, it was super slow and it didn't end even after more than 10 hrs. Can you help to check whether it is the problem of the code or the size of the dataset. This dataset consists of 425 genes and 579517 cells. My codes are shown as below. Thank you for your help.

adata.uns['iroot']=st.spatial.trajectory.set_root( adata, use_label="cell_type_lvl5", cluster='B_C1_LRMP', use_raw=True )
st.spatial.trajectory.pseudotime(adata,eps=50,use_rep="X_pca",use_label="cell_type_lvl5")

@Fabiulous93
Copy link

I would be grateful if there have been any developments on this matter. I have encountered the same issue and would appreciate any solutions you may have found.

@duypham2108
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, we have not been actively developing this software.
Can you increase this eps=50 to match the scale of the adata.obsm['spatial']?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants