Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate training data #78

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Separate training data #78

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

dylanuys
Copy link
Contributor

@dylanuys dylanuys commented Oct 2, 2024

  • Creating separate constants entry for validator datasets, so training datasets can be changed without changing validator behavior
  • Removing old reward function code to clean things up before upcoming reward refactor

@dylanuys dylanuys requested a review from benliang99 October 2, 2024 20:49
@@ -27,6 +27,15 @@
]
}

VALIDATOR_DATASET_META = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question: Should we rename DATASET_META into TRAINING_DATASET_META for clarity? Or something more general, considering we also have the face-specific datasets. @dylanuys

@dylanuys dylanuys merged commit 190016c into main Oct 2, 2024
1 check passed
@dylanuys dylanuys deleted the separate-training-data branch October 6, 2024 07:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants