Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jetty Workaround #566

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023
Merged

Jetty Workaround #566

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

jorg3lopez
Copy link
Contributor

Update Jetty

This PR updates Jetty in our application. Currently, the application uses the Jetty server through Javalin. Javalin is not using the latest version at the moment and their current Jetty version was flagged with a vulnerability. The workaround is adding the newer version to the gradle file.

Copy link
Member

@halprin halprin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this @jorg3lopez. Please add a devex/opex item to our product backlog to revert this change once the new version of Javalin is released that uses the newer version of Jetty.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 13, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@jorg3lopez jorg3lopez merged commit 4b6a788 into main Oct 13, 2023
15 checks passed
@jorg3lopez jorg3lopez deleted the update-jetty branch October 13, 2023 15:41
@halprin halprin mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2023
4 tasks
@halprin
Copy link
Member

halprin commented Oct 13, 2023

@jorg3lopez, I created this devex/opex to track this work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants