Add FAQ entry re identification of possible duplicates reads/pairs #631
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@TomSmithCGAT Had a bit of a tweak (might have gotten carried away) |
|
Not got carried away at all - I think this is perfect! I had something very similar in mind, but was too lazy to do it! I'm happy if we merge this now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've added two entries to the FAQ to explain how possible duplicate reads are identified and why the output of
dedupcan appear to contain reads with the same coordinates. I don't find this easy to explain clearly, so very happy to take suggested edits!See #555 for an example motivation, though I feel like this has come up a few times in issues.