Fix syntax in example #72
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both "pubkey:" and "pubkeys:" formats are supported. The "pubkeys:" format is documented on line 40. I kind of agree that it's confusing to have two different ways, but the current documentation is correct, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Totally still valid! Just not fun to add all the brackets and curlies to convert from string to list.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's probably my eyes that are not as good as they used to. I think the proposed change of documenting multiple keys is already documented on line 40? So copy pasting should work as it has the pubkeys in a list?
Honestly I don't really mind either way, and I can merge this too, I was just wondering if there is something I'm missing?
No description provided.