-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
merge #5866
merge #5866
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@keminu has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review. β How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. π¦ How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (1)
app/constant.ts
(1 hunks)
π Additional comments (1)
app/constant.ts (1)
1-4
: Verify the impact of repository constant changes
Let's check how these constants are used throughout the codebase.
app/constant.ts
Outdated
export const OWNER = ""; | ||
export const REPO = ""; | ||
export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/`; | ||
export const ISSUE_URL = `https://github.com/`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Empty repository constants will break GitHub API functionality
The changes to repository constants introduce several issues:
- Empty
OWNER
andREPO
will break GitHub API calls inFETCH_COMMIT_URL
andFETCH_TAG_URL
- Generic GitHub URLs in
REPO_URL
andISSUE_URL
will break repository-specific links - Inconsistent URL construction - some URLs still use template literals while others are hardcoded
Could you clarify the intent behind removing the repository information? If the goal is to make the constants configurable, consider:
- Using environment variables:
-export const OWNER = "";
-export const REPO = "";
+export const OWNER = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GITHUB_OWNER || "ChatGPTNextWeb";
+export const REPO = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GITHUB_REPO || "ChatGPT-Next-Web";
- Maintaining the template literals for consistency:
-export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/`;
-export const ISSUE_URL = `https://github.com/`;
+export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/${OWNER}/${REPO}`;
+export const ISSUE_URL = `${REPO_URL}/issues`;
π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export const OWNER = ""; | |
export const REPO = ""; | |
export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/`; | |
export const ISSUE_URL = `https://github.com/`; | |
export const OWNER = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GITHUB_OWNER || "ChatGPTNextWeb"; | |
export const REPO = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GITHUB_REPO || "ChatGPT-Next-Web"; | |
export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/${OWNER}/${REPO}`; | |
export const ISSUE_URL = `${REPO_URL}/issues`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/constant.ts (1)
Empty repository constants will break version check functionality
The empty
OWNER
andREPO
constants are used inapp/store/update.ts
for version checking functionality through GitHub API calls. These empty values will cause the fetch calls to fail as they result in invalid URLs:
https://api.github.com/repos//commits?per_page=1
https://api.github.com/repos//tags?per_page=1
π Analysis chain
Line range hint
8-9
: Verify the impact on GitHub API functionalityThe empty repository constants will affect the GitHub API calls in
FETCH_COMMIT_URL
andFETCH_TAG_URL
.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for GitHub API calls using OWNER and REPO constants # Search for GitHub API endpoints that might break echo "Checking GitHub API endpoints that might break..." rg -l 'api\.github\.com/repos/\$\{OWNER\}/\$\{REPO\}' --type ts # Check if there are any direct GitHub API calls in the codebase echo "Checking for direct GitHub API calls..." ast-grep --pattern 'fetch($_, `https://api.github.com/repos/${OWNER}/${REPO}$_`)'Length of output: 363
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check where OWNER and REPO constants are defined and used # Check for OWNER and REPO constant definitions echo "Checking OWNER and REPO constant definitions..." rg "export const (OWNER|REPO)" -A 1 --type ts # Check for imports and usage of these constants echo "Checking imports and usage of OWNER/REPO..." rg "import.*\{.*(OWNER|REPO).*\}" --type ts # Check for actual API calls using these URLs echo "Checking usage of FETCH_COMMIT_URL and FETCH_TAG_URL..." rg "(FETCH_COMMIT_URL|FETCH_TAG_URL)" -A 2 --type tsLength of output: 1818
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (1)
app/constant.ts
(1 hunks)
π Additional comments (2)
app/constant.ts (2)
1-5
:
Inconsistent URL template usage breaks functionality
The changes introduce inconsistency in URL construction:
PLUGINS_REPO_URL
still uses template literals with emptyOWNER
- Other URLs like
UPDATE_URL
andRELEASE_URL
depend on the genericREPO_URL
The previous review comment about empty repository constants is still valid. Additionally, consider maintaining consistency in URL construction:
-export const OWNER = "";
-export const REPO = "";
-export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/`;
-export const PLUGINS_REPO_URL = `https://github.com/${OWNER}/NextChat-Awesome-Plugins`;
+export const OWNER = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GITHUB_OWNER || "ChatGPTNextWeb";
+export const REPO = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GITHUB_REPO || "ChatGPT-Next-Web";
+export const REPO_URL = `https://github.com/${OWNER}/${REPO}`;
+export const PLUGINS_REPO_URL = `https://github.com/${OWNER}/NextChat-Awesome-Plugins`;
6-7
:
Fix cascading URL dependencies
The generic REPO_URL
affects dependent URLs:
UPDATE_URL
will point tohttps://github.com/#keep-updated
RELEASE_URL
will point tohttps://github.com/releases
These URLs need to be updated consistently with the repository configuration:
-export const ISSUE_URL = `https://github.com/`;
+export const ISSUE_URL = `${REPO_URL}/issues`;
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit