Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand no_private_services filter to exclude "not displayed" services #196

Conversation

japauliina
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Add NOT_DISPLAYED services to the no_private_services unit filter.

Context

Refs

How Has This Been Tested?

Unit test and locally testing the enpoint.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #196 (e60495b) into develop (aede5d5) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #196      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    67.26%   67.27%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          215      215              
  Lines         6471     6473       +2     
  Branches       879      879              
===========================================
+ Hits          4353     4355       +2     
  Misses        1948     1948              
  Partials       170      170              
Files Coverage Δ
services/api.py 56.91% <ø> (ø)
services/tests/test_unit_view_set_api.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@japauliina japauliina requested a review from mhieta October 31, 2023 11:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@mhieta mhieta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good :shipit:

@japauliina japauliina merged commit 0382fed into City-of-Helsinki:develop Oct 31, 2023
1 check passed
@japauliina japauliina deleted the fix/modify-no_private_services-filter branch October 31, 2023 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants