-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(gunicorn): Add config #3894
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
loglevel = "debug" | ||
protocol = "proxy" | ||
syslog = True | ||
forwarded_allow_ips = "10.0.2.100,127.0.0.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
forwarded_allow_ips = "127.0.0.1"
I would suggest having deployment-specific configurations in their respective repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, but in a specific future PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But should not the configuration of gunicorn be handled in servers rather than be dictated by code in the repo? If we want to increase the number of workers we shouldn't have to make a PR to cg
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be a even bigger change. And I do not know if it would make sense to move it away from the actual app. Either way it is definitively out of scope.
If you agree - could you approve this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ahdamin @Vince-janv Bump!
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Description
Added
Changed
Fixed
How to prepare for test
us
paxa
How to test
Expected test outcome
Review
Thanks for filling in who performed the code review and the test!
This version is a
Implementation Plan