Add seeEvent/dontSeeEvent event assertions #173
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi! This is a follow-up for #168. In this update, I've added the
seeEvent/dontSeeEventmethods, which check if an event was dispatched without considering whether the listener processed it.This approach allows the assertion to cover both orphan and non-orphan events. Therefore, this should help keep tests "green" during development, especially in scenarios where listeners might be added after the event's introduction.
Additionally, this PR consolidates
assertEventTriggeredandassertEventNotTriggeredinto a single method to reduce duplication, as the method became a bit more complex.PR with tests.