Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] Make codecov action optional in workflows #559

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

kyzooghost
Copy link
Contributor

This PR implements issue(s) #543

Checklist

  • I wrote new tests for my new core changes.
  • I have successfully ran tests, style checker and build against my new changes locally.
  • I have informed the team of any breaking changes if there are any.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.49%. Comparing base (d29cdd4) to head (5964d69).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #559   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     68.49%   68.49%           
  Complexity     1130     1130           
=========================================
  Files           321      321           
  Lines         12842    12842           
  Branches       1287     1287           
=========================================
  Hits           8796     8796           
  Misses         3506     3506           
  Partials        540      540           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
hardhat 98.74% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 5cb7752
kotlin 66.05% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

@kyzooghost kyzooghost temporarily deployed to docker-build-and-e2e January 16, 2025 01:48 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@kyzooghost kyzooghost merged commit 26ba22e into main Jan 16, 2025
24 checks passed
@kyzooghost kyzooghost deleted the fix/optional-codecov-token branch January 16, 2025 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants