Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 18, 2022. It is now read-only.

[PAN-3111] Moves getTransactionReceipt from eea to priv #42

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 27, 2019

Conversation

josh-richardson
Copy link
Contributor

Renames EeaGetTransactionReceipt to PrivGetTransactionReceipt

The relevant PR in Pantheon and the issue:
PegaSysEng/pantheon#1927
https://pegasys1.atlassian.net/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=57&projectKey=PAN&modal=detail&selectedIssue=PAN-3111

@josh-richardson josh-richardson changed the title Moves getTransactionReceipt from eea to priv [PAN-3111] Moves getTransactionReceipt from eea to priv Sep 12, 2019
@josh-richardson josh-richardson marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2019 10:45
Copy link
Contributor

@MadelineMurray MadelineMurray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When I tried to run deployContract.js with these changes, I got the following error:

TypeError: web3.eea.getTransactionReceipt is not a function
    at getPrivateContractAddress (/Users/madelinemurray/eeajs/example/multiNodeExample/deployContract.js:29:6)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)

Are there more updates needed to the actual examples themselves?

@josh-richardson
Copy link
Contributor Author

josh-richardson commented Sep 19, 2019

@MadelineMurray good call. I've updated, but some of the integration tests still fail here as pantheon-quickstart is still outdated and the PR to move getTransactionReceipt from eea to priv hasn't yet been merged.

@josh-richardson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Quickstart has now been updated and all of the integration tests now pass. This can be merged.

@MadelineMurray MadelineMurray merged commit 23c19ed into Consensys:master Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants