Improve completion of Copilot keywords #384
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Instead of only triggering completion with '/' or '@', completion can also be manually triggered.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
jellydn
force-pushed
the
feat/improved_cmp
branch
from
cbd47e5 to
3324c70
Compare
|
Thanks @guill. I don't use this feature much so let's see @deathbeam's view on this approach. |
|
I dont use it either (as I dont use nvim-cmp) but looks good to me |
deathbeam
approved these changes
Aug 6, 2024
|
@all-contributors add @guill for code. |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @guill! 🎉 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, completion in nvim-cmp would only happen when typing the
@or/character. Therewas no way to type a partial command (e.g.
/COPILOT_G) and then autocomplete.This PR adds a keyword pattern to allow this sort of completion in a case-insensitive way.
If the previous behavior was an intentional design decision, feel free to close this PR. (I changed
it for my own usage, but figured other people might like it as well.)