-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature 1123 ddb update #1125
Feature 1123 ddb update #1125
Conversation
…b.com/DSGT-DLP/Deep-Learning-Playground into feature-1073-terraform-trainspace-ddb
…ve unnecessary values
…b.com/DSGT-DLP/Deep-Learning-Playground into feature-1073-terraform-trainspace-ddb
…b.com/DSGT-DLP/Deep-Learning-Playground into feature-1073-terraform-trainspace-ddb
Delete the |
@farisdurrani should this be gitignored? |
Yes. Deleted and gitignored |
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ | |||
import { APIGatewayProxyHandlerV2 } from "aws-lambda"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MugPand i think the api logic and terraform stuff is mixed int the same PR
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions 13.4% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%) |
DynamoDB & Terraform Update
Github Issue Number Here: GitHub #1123
What user problem are we solving?
The current DynamoDB tables and Terraform script reflect an older version of infra-configurations.
What solution does this PR provide?
Updated DynamoDB tables and Terraform script to reflect new changes proposed by the following diagram: Also added user_id as GSI to ModelTable.
Testing Methodology
Any other considerations