Feature 1123 Added Trainspace, Model, User Tables to Terraform Infra

[MugPand]

DynamoDB & Terraform Update

Github Issue Number Here: GitHub #1123
What user problem are we solving?
The current DynamoDB tables and Terraform script reflect an older version of infra-configurations.

What solution does this PR provide?
Updated DynamoDB tables and Terraform script to reflect new changes proposed by the following diagram: Also added user_id as GSI to ModelTable.

Testing Methodology

How did you test your changes and verify that existing functionality is not broken
Ran terraform file configurations and validated created DynamoDB Tables on AWS.

Any other considerations

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[farisdurrani]

This isn't mandatory but do try applying the tf plan and then destroy the built resources to make sure the .tf file works.

terraform init
terraform fmt
terraform plan
terraform apply
terraform destroy

It may not work if you don't have the proper access. I'll approve this after 24 hours to see if anyone else has any comments

[MugPand]

This isn't mandatory but do try applying the tf plan and then destroy the built resources to make sure the .tf file works.

terraform init
terraform fmt
terraform plan
terraform apply
terraform destroy

It may not work if you don't have the proper access. I'll approve this after 24 hours to see if anyone else has any comments

@karkir0003 and I just tested that successfully.

[karkir0003]

This isn't mandatory but do try applying the tf plan and then destroy the built resources to make sure the .tf file works.

terraform init
terraform fmt
terraform plan
terraform apply
terraform destroy

It may not work if you don't have the proper access. I'll approve this after 24 hours to see if anyone else has any comments

can we make this a best practice for tf related stuff?? can it be automated

[farisdurrani]

Yes, this should be best practice. Can it be automated? Yes, but I won't recommend it. If it fails, there may be AWS resources that will never get destroyed (more cost)

[farisdurrani]

Feel free to merge @MugPand