-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[USMON-1399] Fix gRPC bug #32809
[USMON-1399] Fix gRPC bug #32809
Conversation
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 52532854 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision |
eBPF complexity changesSummary result: ✅ - stable
usm detailsusm [programs with changes]
usm [programs without changes]
This report was generated based on the complexity data for the current branch amit.slavin/fix-grpc-bug (pipeline 52532854, commit 13824bb) and the base branch main (commit af0d8cb). Objects without changes are not reported. Contact #ebpf-platform if you have any questions/feedback. Table complexity legend: 🔵 - new; ⚪ - unchanged; 🟢 - reduced; 🔴 - increased |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: af0d8cb Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +3.47 | [+2.79, +4.14] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.36 | [+0.32, +0.39] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +0.30 | [-2.93, +3.53] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.08 | [-0.70, +0.86] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.64, +0.71] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.85, +0.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.02, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.12, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.87, +0.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.66, +0.62] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.89, +0.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.84, +0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.27 | [-0.74, +0.19] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.28 | [-0.38, -0.19] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.37 | [-0.51, -0.24] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -2.29 | [-2.34, -2.23] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
(cherry picked from commit bba2fb6)
What does this PR do?
Fix a bug in gRPC and HTTP/2 traffic that caused an accuracy drop.
Motivation
We currently have a bug in the HTTP/2 and gRPC decoding flow where we do not mark TLS traffic with
FLAG_USM_ENABLED
, causing the map not to be cleaned, which leads to an accuracy drop.The fix is to mark TLS traffic with the USM flag so the map cleaner can properly clean it.
Describe how you validated your changes
Example of the change in the load test which show the impact of the solution.
Example of the change in the load test before the change.
We can see that the accuracy now matches the previous version, and there are no accuracy drop as seen in the previous version.
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes