Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CWS] do not allocate a new event for every field in eventTypeFromFields #33324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

paulcacheux
Copy link
Contributor

@paulcacheux paulcacheux commented Jan 23, 2025

What does this PR do?

GetFieldMetadata is currently a method on the event, but really it's more a property of the model. No need to allocate a full on new event at each iteration.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@paulcacheux paulcacheux changed the title [CWS] do not allocate a new event for every field in `eventTypeFromFi… [CWS] do not allocate a new event for every field in eventTypeFromFields Jan 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added component/system-probe team/agent-security short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Jan 23, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Jan 23, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 1feb84b482c89319257177625316d303e43286c3

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb -0.01MB 58.87MB 58.88MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb -0.01MB 56.38MB 56.39MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm -0.01MB 58.95MB 58.95MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse -0.01MB 58.95MB 58.95MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.05MB 90.04MB 90.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb -0.05MB 89.97MB 90.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb -0.05MB 93.91MB 93.97MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.05MB 93.98MB 94.04MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse -0.05MB 93.98MB 94.04MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb -0.06MB 477.83MB 477.89MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -1.50MB 915.81MB 917.31MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -1.50MB 925.53MB 927.03MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -2.05MB 938.34MB 940.40MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -2.05MB 938.34MB 940.40MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -2.05MB 928.60MB 930.66MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=53846485 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 1543d21

@paulcacheux paulcacheux marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 20:00
@paulcacheux paulcacheux requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 20:00
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 590e7539-0ed2-45fd-8ac2-5629dba1e63f

Baseline: fa60e46
Comparison: 1543d21
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.54 [-1.55, +4.62] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.79 [-0.16, +1.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.65 [-0.14, +1.44] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.28 [-0.50, +1.07] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.23 [+0.18, +0.29] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.07 [-0.78, +0.93] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.86, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.63, +0.65] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.30, +0.30] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.02, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.01 [-0.47, +0.46] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.75, +0.71] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.93, +0.87] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.21 [-0.25, -0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.28 [-0.31, -0.24] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.28 [-0.35, -0.21] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@paulcacheux
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-24 08:32:12 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 34m.


2025-01-24 08:59:23 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit ea4f40b into main Jan 24, 2025
257 of 259 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the paulcacheux/field-metadata-opt branch January 24, 2025 08:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.64.0 milestone Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants