Ruff: Fix D403 (#11498)

dojo/importers/base_importer.py

@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ def parse_dynamic_test_type_findings_from_tests(
         tests: list[Test],
     ) -> list[Finding]:
         """
-        currently we only support import one Test
+        Currently we only support import one Test
         so for parser that support multiple tests (like SARIF)
         we aggregate all the findings into one uniq test
         """

dojo/jira_link/views.py

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ def webhook_responser_handler(
 @require_POST
 def webhook(request, secret=None):
     """
-    for examples of incoming json, see the unit tests for the webhook:
+    For examples of incoming json, see the unit tests for the webhook:
         https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo/blob/master/unittests/test_jira_webhook.py
     or the officials docs (which are not always clear):
         https://developer.atlassian.com/server/jira/platform/webhooks/
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ def webhook(request, secret=None):
 
 def check_for_and_create_comment(parsed_json):
     """
-    example incoming requests from JIRA Server 8.14.0
+    Example incoming requests from JIRA Server 8.14.0
     {
     "timestamp":1610269967824,
     "webhookEvent":"comment_created",

dojo/tools/scantist/parser.py

@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ def get_findings(self, file, test):
 
     def get_items(self, tree, test):
         """
-        tree list: input tree list of all the vulnerability findings
+        Tree list: input tree list of all the vulnerability findings
         test:
         : purpose: parses input rawto extract dojo
         """
 
         def get_findings(vuln, test):
             """
-            vuln : input vulnerable node
+            Vuln : input vulnerable node
             test :
             """
             vulnerability_id = vuln.get("Public ID")

dojo/tools/utils.py

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 def get_npm_cwe(item_node):
     """
-    possible values:
+    Possible values:
         "cwe": null
         "cwe": ["CWE-173", "CWE-200","CWE-601"]  (or [])
         "cwe": "CWE-1234"

dojo/tools/wiz/parser.py

@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ def _construct_string_field(self, fields: dict[str, str], row: dict) -> str:
 
     def _parse_tags(self, tags: str) -> list[str]:
         """
-        parse the Tag string dict, and convert to a list of strings.
+        Parse the Tag string dict, and convert to a list of strings.
 
         The format of the tags is is "{""key"":""value""}" format
         """

unittests/test_finding_model.py

@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ def run(self, result=None):
 
     def test_sla_expiration_date(self):
         """
-        tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
+        Tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
         after a finding's severity is updated
         """
         user, _ = User.objects.get_or_create(username="admin")
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ def test_sla_expiration_date(self):
 
     def test_sla_expiration_date_after_finding_severity_updated(self):
         """
-        tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
+        Tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
         after a finding's severity is updated
         """
         user, _ = User.objects.get_or_create(username="admin")
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ def test_sla_expiration_date_after_finding_severity_updated(self):
 
     def test_sla_expiration_date_after_product_updated(self):
         """
-        tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
+        Tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
         after a product changed from one SLA configuration to another
         """
         user, _ = User.objects.get_or_create(username="admin")
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ def test_sla_expiration_date_after_product_updated(self):
 
     def test_sla_expiration_date_after_sla_configuration_updated(self):
         """
-        tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
+        Tests if the SLA expiration date and SLA days remaining are calculated correctly
         after the SLA configuration on a product was updated to a different number of SLA days
         """
         user, _ = User.objects.get_or_create(username="admin")
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ def test_sla_expiration_date_after_sla_configuration_updated(self):
 
     def test_sla_expiration_date_after_sla_not_enforced(self):
         """
-        tests if the SLA expiration date is none after the after the SLA configuration on a
+        Tests if the SLA expiration date is none after the after the SLA configuration on a
         product was updated to not enforce all SLA remediation days
         """
         user, _ = User.objects.get_or_create(username="admin")

unittests/tools/test_sonarqube_parser.py

@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ def test_detailed_parse_file_with_vuln_issue_3725(self):
 
     def test_detailed_parse_file_table_has_whitespace(self):
         """
-        from version 3.1.1: sonarqube-report has new template with some change.
+        From version 3.1.1: sonarqube-report has new template with some change.
         see: https://github.com/soprasteria/sonar-report/commit/7dab559e7ecf9ed319345e9262a8b160bd3af94f
         Data table will have some whitespaces, parser should strip it before compare or use these properties.
         """