-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{2023.06}[foss/2021a] ESPResSo v4.2.1 #332
{2023.06}[foss/2021a] ESPResSo v4.2.1 #332
Conversation
Instance
|
Where did the |
@maxim-masterov That comes from For now, ignore the CI failures (they'll fail anyway until this module is installed), and let's trigger a test build? It would be helpful if you first sync your PR branch here with current |
…o espresso_2021a
…ayer into espresso_2021a
bot: build repo:eessi-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic |
Updates by the bot instance
|
New job on instance
|
New job on instance
|
Incorporated changes in PR 18963 |
bot: build repo:eessi-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/generic |
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
New job on instance
|
New job on instance
|
bot: build repo:eessi-2023.06-software arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1 |
Updates by the bot instance
|
bot: show_config |
Updates by the bot instance
|
Instance
|
bot: build repo:eessi-hpc.org-2023.06-software arch:aarch64/neoverse_v1 |
Updates by the bot instance
|
New job on instance
|
The build that is failing is
So, it's actually I've tried the build interactively on the |
Interactively, I do error out on the ESPResSo build btw...
But we can worry about that later (if it occurs also when the bot does it). |
So, I've done a bit of reading. It fails in the Autocompleter for modules. That autocompleter has to create a cache first. It seems there is a timeout on that, controlled by this line. It might be that creation of this cache is indeed slow. Could be that it simply needs to crawl through a lot of CVMFS paths, which could be slow. Could be that going through the build dir is slow - I think the bot is building in a writeable overlay, which I believe may be a bit slow (also to read?). We could try to increase that TIMEOUT. Or skip the test. Or ignore the test failures... The only thing I can't really explain is why we haven't seen it with other |
@casparvl This sounded somewhat familiar, and it seems I have run into this as well a few years ago: |
I reproduced this issue now also interactively, by running the container with:
and using the default I'll adapt my docs in this pr so that building in the writeable overlay is explained (instead of in |
I'm going to close this. We have ESPResSo now in the |
{2023.06}[foss/2023b] Qt5 v5.15.13
Add ESPResSo for 2021a without CUDA support