Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updates_for_finding_routes_for_applicance_sample #2130

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cariashuang0417
Copy link
Contributor

  • updated map.content.draw and symbols
  • updated to folder.add for fgdb item

Note: I am not able to test the outputs since the original csv data is missing. For symbols, I've tested on similar point and polyline feature layers, and they works. @nanaeaubry could you check if my formatting change for symbols are in line with new mapping module standards? Thanks :)

@cariashuang0417 cariashuang0417 added documentation Bugs and enhancement requests for doc (API ref and notebooks) update_24 labels Oct 23, 2024
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link

review-notebook-app bot commented Oct 23, 2024

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

nanaeaubry commented on 2024-10-23T08:48:46Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

The draw needs to be changed to: map_view_ouputs.content.draw in a couple places


@nanaeaubry
Copy link
Contributor

@cariashuang0417 Looks good for symbols but left one comment about the draw method being on content.draw now

Copy link
Contributor

@nanaeaubry nanaeaubry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small comment in notebook

@cariashuang0417
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cariashuang0417 Looks good for symbols but left one comment about the draw method being on content.draw now

ooops forgot to change the draw() method - just updated the PR for them

@nanaeaubry nanaeaubry self-requested a review October 23, 2024 14:53
Copy link
Contributor

@nanaeaubry nanaeaubry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looooooks goooood :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Bugs and enhancement requests for doc (API ref and notebooks) update_24
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants