-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
velopack prepare #2798
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
velopack prepare #2798
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe primary change in the Flow Launcher Core project involves updating its version handling mechanism. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@check-spelling-bot Report🔴 Please reviewSee the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.
See ❌ Event descriptions for more information. If the flagged items are 🤯 false positivesIf items relate to a ...
|
🥷 Code experts: no user but you matched threshold 10 jjw24 has most 🧠 knowledge in the files. See details
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Knowledge based on git-blame: To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs |
This PR is 57.14285714285714% new code. |
Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ private async Task<UpdateManager> GitHubUpdateManagerAsync(string repository) | |||
await using var jsonStream = await Http.GetStreamAsync(api).ConfigureAwait(false); | |||
|
|||
var releases = await System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.DeserializeAsync<List<GithubRelease>>(jsonStream).ConfigureAwait(false); | |||
var latest = releases.Where(r => !r.Prerelease).OrderByDescending(r => r.PublishedAt).First(); | |||
var latest = releases.OrderByDescending(r => r.PublishedAt).First(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optimization of fetching the latest release
The current implementation fetches all releases and then sorts them to find the latest. This could be optimized by using GitHub API parameters to directly fetch the latest release, reducing the amount of data transferred and processed.
- var latest = releases.OrderByDescending(r => r.PublishedAt).First();
+ // Assuming GitHub API supports fetching only the latest release:
+ var latest = await Http.GetLatestReleaseAsync(api); // This method needs to be implemented
Consider adding error handling for the scenario where no releases are found, which could throw an exception when calling First()
.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit