Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

velopack prepare #2798

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

velopack prepare #2798

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

taooceros
Copy link
Member

@taooceros taooceros commented Jun 23, 2024

  • Use SemanticVersioning to check about new version
  • Allow Prerelease

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved version handling with the integration of semantic versioning to enhance update management.
  • Refactor
    • Updated version comparison logic to leverage SemanticVersioning library.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The primary change in the Flow Launcher Core project involves updating its version handling mechanism. The SemanticVersioning package has been added to replace the traditional Version handling in order to support more advanced versioning features, including pre-release versions. This update alters how the Updater class manages and filters release versions.

Changes

Files Summary
Flow.Launcher.Core/Flow.Launcher.Core.csproj Added a new package reference to "SemanticVersioning" version "3.0.0-beta2".
Flow.Launcher.Core/Updater.cs Replaced Version with SemanticVersioning.Version for newReleaseVersion and currentVersion. Modified release filtering to exclude Prerelease check.

Poem

🎉 In the land where versions grow,
🐇 A change has come, a gentle flow.
🌱 From Version old to Semantic new,
📦 Beta shines with promises true.
🌟 Launcher's heart beats in delight,
Keeping updates ever bright and right.
🚀 In the world of code, take flight!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.19.0 milestone Jun 23, 2024
Copy link

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
❌ ignored-expect-variant 1
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 13

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Jun 23, 2024

🥷 Code experts: no user but you matched threshold 10

jjw24 has most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

Flow.Launcher.Core/Flow.Launcher.Core.csproj

Knowledge based on git-blame:
jjw24: 14%

Flow.Launcher.Core/Updater.cs

Knowledge based on git-blame:
jjw24: 12%

To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Jun 23, 2024

This PR is 57.14285714285714% new code.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

@prlabeler prlabeler bot added Code Refactor enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ private async Task<UpdateManager> GitHubUpdateManagerAsync(string repository)
await using var jsonStream = await Http.GetStreamAsync(api).ConfigureAwait(false);

var releases = await System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.DeserializeAsync<List<GithubRelease>>(jsonStream).ConfigureAwait(false);
var latest = releases.Where(r => !r.Prerelease).OrderByDescending(r => r.PublishedAt).First();
var latest = releases.OrderByDescending(r => r.PublishedAt).First();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optimization of fetching the latest release

The current implementation fetches all releases and then sorts them to find the latest. This could be optimized by using GitHub API parameters to directly fetch the latest release, reducing the amount of data transferred and processed.

- var latest = releases.OrderByDescending(r => r.PublishedAt).First();
+ // Assuming GitHub API supports fetching only the latest release:
+ var latest = await Http.GetLatestReleaseAsync(api); // This method needs to be implemented

Consider adding error handling for the scenario where no releases are found, which could throw an exception when calling First().

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

@taooceros taooceros removed this from the 1.19.0 milestone Jun 26, 2024
@taooceros taooceros added the Debug Only Only appears on Debug label Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant