Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gitstream.cm minutes to review trigger rule #2960

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jjw24
Copy link
Member

@jjw24 jjw24 commented Sep 5, 2024

Update gitstream.cm minutes to review trigger rule

Update gitstream.cm minutes to review trigger rule
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new regex pattern for branch triggers in automation processes, specifically targeting branches associated with Dependabot and Renovate. Additionally, the estimated_time_to_review automation has been updated to trigger on commits, expanding its activation conditions. These modifications enhance the control flow of the automation logic, allowing for more precise handling of branch events and commit actions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.cm/gitstream.cm Added a regex pattern for triggers.branch to match Dependabot and Renovate branches. Updated automations.estimated_time_to_review to include a trigger on commits.

Poem

🐰 In the garden where the code does bloom,
New patterns dance, dispelling gloom.
With Dependabot hopping, and Renovate near,
Our automations sing, bringing cheer!
Let's celebrate changes, both big and small,
For in this tech meadow, there's joy for us all! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d018ed and a6817b4.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .cm/gitstream.cm (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .cm/gitstream.cm

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.19.2 milestone Sep 5, 2024
@jjw24 jjw24 enabled auto-merge September 5, 2024 23:21
@jjw24 jjw24 added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 5, 2024
@jjw24 jjw24 added CI/CD and removed cm-changes labels Sep 5, 2024

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

.cm/gitstream.cm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.cm/gitstream.cm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2024

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
❌ check-file-path 1
❌ ignored-expect-variant 1
⚠️ noisy-file 1
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 13

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@jjw24 jjw24 merged commit 8b3c844 into dev Sep 10, 2024
4 of 7 checks passed
@jjw24 jjw24 deleted the min_review_trigger_rule branch September 10, 2024 01:12
@jjw24 jjw24 mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working CI/CD cm-changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants