Use DerivabilityCondition
for simple proof
#4
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
素人考えでは
Logic.FirstOrder.Incompleteness.DerivabilityCondition
を使えば証明はほとんど削減できるのではと思うのだが、どうなのだろうか?一応Diagonalizaation
,D1
,D2
,D3
は通っているので、GoedelSound
(特にゲーデル文に対しての健全性)だけあとは証明できれば第二不完全性定理およびLoebの定理が直ちに従うはず。追伸: ArithmetizationのリポジトリにブランチをpushしてPRを作る権限がないので渡してもらえると若干助かる。