Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Operatives for working with enums #120

Merged

Conversation

Jesin
Copy link
Contributor

@Jesin Jesin commented Oct 16, 2024

No description provided.

@Jesin Jesin force-pushed the feature/constructor-operatives branch from dce6465 to 6ece3ba Compare October 30, 2024 04:12
@Jesin Jesin force-pushed the feature/constructor-operatives branch from 6ece3ba to b3ba09a Compare November 3, 2024 09:22
@Jesin Jesin marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 10:28
@ErikMcClure ErikMcClure requested a review from aiverson November 17, 2024 13:14
base-env.lua Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
base-env.lua Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
base-env.lua Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Jesin and others added 3 commits November 20, 2024 18:27
to match syntax variants before invoking collect_tuple
makes expression errors inside mk easier to find
@Jesin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jesin commented Nov 21, 2024

I was looking at let_bind and intrinsic and I decided 2 examples was sufficient to infer a sort-of naming convention. I have fixed those too.

I will now make the type annotation in a separate PR.

@ErikMcClure ErikMcClure requested a review from aiverson November 21, 2024 03:12
@ErikMcClure ErikMcClure force-pushed the feature/constructor-operatives branch from c16e454 to 043de52 Compare January 5, 2025 09:12
@ErikMcClure ErikMcClure merged commit 91e7a93 into Fundament-Software:main Jan 6, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants