Renamed LLMModel.name to LLMModel.model

[maykcaldas]

This is just a renaming. No new feature is implemented. Reasoning behind the renaming:
-pqa expects to receive a name to its LLM. This name is used to create the config as litellm.router expects it, if not provided. A model_list is created and added to the config:

{
"model_list": [
                    {
                        "model_name": data["name"],
                        "litellm_params": {
                            "model": data["name"],
                            "n": data["config"].get("n", 1),
                            "temperature": data["config"].get("temperature", 0.1),
                            "max_tokens": data["config"].get("max_tokens", 4096),
                        }

• ldp uses a model keyword to refer to the name.

I am proposing this change because I think model is more aligned with litellm nomenclature. Then, opening this PR to get feedback on that

[jamesbraza]

I feel this creates a recursive nature to naming, which is not intuitive to me. I prefer name to model

model = LLMModel(model=model)

[jamesbraza]

I think the interface is more important than adapter implementations being slightly more confusing. We should just unit test the adapters

[maykcaldas]

Yeah, the repetition on naming is a good point. Maybe because I think of that as llm=LLMModel(model=model), renaming made sense to me.
Gotcha. Will close this PR and keep name