Jmm/resolve cog baseline bug

[JeanMarie-PM]

PR checklist: submitters

• Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
• List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
• For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
• Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
• Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
• Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
• Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
• Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.

PR checklist: reviewers

• Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
• Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
• Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
• Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

What does the PR fix

When running run_2022 locally, noticed that a new entry was being created in CognizantBaseline for every assugnment of a cognizant_agency. We should not beadding a new entry if there is already a valid entry in this table.
The test cases to test this scenario were not doing the right thing and hence tests were passing.
Updated the tst case to test this consition. Re-ran run_2022 and it creates fewer entries now as it should be.
Made minor tweaks to admin.py to be able to see the data better on the admin screen. This change is not required to fix he bug, but was useful in resolving it.

[github-actions]

Terraform plan for dev

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev.module.database.cloudfoundry_service_instance.rds,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev.database/database/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "rds":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 2 more similar warnings elsewhere)

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #349

[github-actions]

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #349

[github-actions]

File	Coverage		Missing
All files	86%	✅
api/serializers.py	88%	✅	177-178 183 188
api/test_views.py	95%	✅	103
api/uei.py	88%	✅	87 118-119 163 167-168
api/views.py	98%	✅	195-196 334-335
audit/file_downloads.py	73%	❌	35-53 81-83
audit/forms.py	47%	❌	22-29 142-149
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py	92%	✅	67-68 201-207 257
audit/models.py	84%	❌	58 60 65 67 214 226-229 247 420 438-439 447 469 558-559 563 571 580 586
audit/test_commands.py	87%	✅
audit/test_mixins.py	90%	✅	112-113 117-119 184-185 189-191
audit/test_validators.py	95%	✅	436 440 608-609 848 855 862 869
audit/test_views.py	95%	✅	410-442 451-482 491-519
audit/test_workbooks_should_fail.py	88%	✅	56 83-84 88
audit/test_workbooks_should_pass.py	90%	✅	56 81
audit/utils.py	70%	❌	13 21 33-35 38
audit/validators.py	92%	✅	137 189 283-292 299-308 486-490 495-499 515-524
audit/views.py	31%	❌	90-111 134-135 209-210 255-256 267-268 270-274 321-334 337-351 356-369 386-392 397-417 420-448 453-482 485-529 534-554 557-585 590-619 622-666 671-683 686-696 701-713 740-741 746-795 798-838 841-858
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py	93%	✅	33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py	93%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py	87%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py	91%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py	90%	✅
audit/cross_validation/errors.py	78%	❌	30 69
audit/cross_validation/naming.py	93%	✅	182
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py	95%	✅	79
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py	81%	❌	33 36 40
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py	93%	✅	28-29
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py	55%	❌	146-183 229-238
audit/intakelib/exceptions.py	71%	❌	7-9 12
audit/intakelib/intermediate_representation.py	91%	✅	27-28 73 91 129 162 200-203 212-213
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings.py	97%	✅	53
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings_text.py	97%	✅	52
audit/intakelib/mapping_federal_awards.py	93%	✅	95
audit/intakelib/mapping_util.py	81%	❌	21 25 29 99 104-105 114-120 130 145 150
audit/intakelib/checks/check_all_unique_award_numbers.py	79%	❌	24
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cardinality_of_passthrough_names_and_ids.py	91%	✅
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_total.py	85%	✅	49 65
audit/intakelib/checks/check_finding_prior_references_pattern.py	73%	❌	33 43-44
audit/intakelib/checks/check_findings_grid_validation.py	84%	❌	58
audit/intakelib/checks/check_has_all_the_named_ranges.py	84%	❌	52
audit/intakelib/checks/check_is_a_workbook.py	69%	❌	20
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_balance_entries.py	78%	❌	22 39-40
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_balance_present.py	76%	❌	27 36
audit/intakelib/checks/check_look_for_empty_rows.py	91%	✅	18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_major_program_no_type.py	76%	❌	18 27
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_repeat_findings.py	76%	❌	21 30
audit/intakelib/checks/check_other_cluster_names.py	81%	❌	24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_passthrough_name_when_no_direct.py	88%	✅	9 47
audit/intakelib/checks/check_sequential_award_numbers.py	76%	❌	14 22
audit/intakelib/checks/check_show_ir.py	70%	❌	8-14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_start_and_end_rows_of_all_columns_are_same.py	89%	✅	14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_state_cluster_names.py	65%	❌	23-24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_version_number.py	73%	❌	21 31-32
audit/intakelib/checks/runners.py	95%	✅	129
audit/intakelib/common/util.py	89%	✅	21 38
audit/intakelib/transforms/xform_reformat_prior_references.py	55%	❌	12-17
audit/intakelib/transforms/xform_rename_additional_notes_sheet.py	81%	❌	14
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py	46%	❌	39-45
audit/viewlib/submission_progress_view.py	89%	✅	111 171-172
audit/viewlib/tribal_data_consent.py	34%	❌	23-41 44-79
audit/viewlib/unlock_after_certification.py	57%	❌	28-47 69-83
audit/viewlib/upload_report_view.py	26%	❌	32-35 44 91-117 120-170 178-209
config/urls.py	71%	❌	83
dissemination/models.py	99%	✅	460
dissemination/search.py	51%	❌	19 69-97 104-114
dissemination/views.py	62%	❌	29-31 34-92 159 161 163
dissemination/migrations/0002_general_fac_accepted_date.py	47%	❌	10-12
djangooidc/backends.py	78%	❌	32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py	66%	❌	19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py	16%	❌	32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py	80%	❌	22 43 114
djangooidc/tests/common.py	96%	✅
report_submission/forms.py	92%	✅	35
report_submission/views.py	76%	❌	83 215-216 218 240-241 260-261 287-396 399-409
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py	76%	❌	8 11-14 18
support/admin.py	88%	✅	76 79 84 91-97 100-102
support/cog_over.py	91%	✅	30-33 93 145
support/models.py	89%	✅	103-104
support/test_cog_over.py	98%	✅	134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py	98%	✅	20-21
tools/update_program_data.py	89%	✅	96
users/auth.py	95%	✅	40-41
users/models.py	97%	✅	51-52
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py	91%	✅

Minimum allowed coverage is 85%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against eead0c6

[danswick]

@JeanMarie-TTS can we catch this up with main so @tadhg-ohiggins's PR is more reviewable?

[JeanMarie-PM]

@danswick Merfed with main as requested. All tests passed.