Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update requirements moving model_bakery to primary requirements out of dev #2638

Conversation

tadhg-ohiggins
Copy link
Contributor

“The bakery’s open.”
“Bake it until you make it.”
“Bread: not just for devs.”


Since we’re now using workbook generation in more places, and specifically via backend/dissemination/management/commands/end_to_end_test_data_generator.py, we need to move model_bakery out of dev-requirements and into requirements

If the tests pass, this PR should be fine.

@tadhg-ohiggins tadhg-ohiggins temporarily deployed to dev October 27, 2023 16:07 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@tadhg-ohiggins tadhg-ohiggins temporarily deployed to meta October 27, 2023 16:07 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Terraform plan for dev

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev.module.database.cloudfoundry_service_instance.rds,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev.database/database/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "rds":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 2 more similar warnings elsewhere)

📝 Plan generated in Pull Request Checks #1509

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

📝 Plan generated in Pull Request Checks #1509

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

File Coverage Missing
All files 87%
api/serializers.py 88% 177-178 183 188
api/test_views.py 95% 103
api/uei.py 88% 87 118-119 163 167-168
api/views.py 98% 195-196 334-335
audit/file_downloads.py 35% 16-21 26-44 48-74
audit/forms.py 47% 22-29 142-149
audit/intake_to_dissemination.py 92% 67-68 201-207 257
audit/models.py 86% 58 60 65 67 214 247 420 438-439 447 469 558-559 563 571 580 586
audit/test_commands.py 87%
audit/test_mixins.py 90% 112-113 117-119 184-185 189-191
audit/test_validators.py 95% 436 440 608-609 848 855 862 869
audit/test_views.py 95% 386-418 427-458 467-495
audit/test_workbooks_should_fail.py 88% 56 83-84 88
audit/test_workbooks_should_pass.py 90% 56 81
audit/utils.py 70% 13 21 33-35 38
audit/validators.py 92% 137 189 283-292 299-308 486-490 495-499 515-524
audit/views.py 31% 88-109 132-133 207-208 253-254 265-266 268-272 319-332 335-349 354-367 384-390 395-415 418-446 451-480 483-527 532-552 555-583 588-617 620-664 669-681 684-694 699-711 738-739 744-793 796-836 839-856
audit/cross_validation/additional_ueis.py 93% 33
audit/cross_validation/check_award_ref_declaration.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_award_reference_uniqueness.py 93%
audit/cross_validation/check_certifying_contacts.py 87%
audit/cross_validation/check_findings_count_consistency.py 91%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_cap.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/check_ref_number_in_findings_text.py 90%
audit/cross_validation/errors.py 78% 30 69
audit/cross_validation/naming.py 93% 182
audit/cross_validation/submission_progress_check.py 95% 79
audit/cross_validation/tribal_data_sharing_consent.py 81% 33 36 40
audit/cross_validation/validate_general_information.py 93% 28-29
audit/fixtures/single_audit_checklist.py 55% 146-183 229-238
audit/intakelib/exceptions.py 71% 7-9 12
audit/intakelib/intermediate_representation.py 92% 27-28 73 91 129 162 200-203
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings.py 97% 51
audit/intakelib/mapping_audit_findings_text.py 97% 51
audit/intakelib/mapping_federal_awards.py 93% 95
audit/intakelib/mapping_util.py 81% 21 25 29 99 104-105 114-120 130 145 150
audit/intakelib/checks/check_all_unique_award_numbers.py 79% 24
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cardinality_of_passthrough_names_and_ids.py 91%
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_name_always_present.py 82% 21
audit/intakelib/checks/check_cluster_total.py 85% 49 65
audit/intakelib/checks/check_federal_award_passed_always_present.py 82% 18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_findings_grid_validation.py 84% 57
audit/intakelib/checks/check_has_all_the_named_ranges.py 84% 52
audit/intakelib/checks/check_is_a_workbook.py 68% 16
audit/intakelib/checks/check_loan_guarantee.py 90% 51
audit/intakelib/checks/check_look_for_empty_rows.py 91% 18
audit/intakelib/checks/check_missing_award_numbers.py 72% 16 22-23
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_major_program_no_type.py 72% 22 31 40
audit/intakelib/checks/check_no_repeat_findings.py 76% 17 26
audit/intakelib/checks/check_other_cluster_names.py 81% 24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/check_passthrough_name_when_no_direct.py 88% 9 47
audit/intakelib/checks/check_sequential_award_numbers.py 76% 14 22
audit/intakelib/checks/check_show_ir.py 70% 8-14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_start_and_end_rows_of_all_columns_are_same.py 89% 14
audit/intakelib/checks/check_state_cluster_names.py 65% 23-24 34
audit/intakelib/checks/runners.py 95% 132
audit/intakelib/checks/util.py 85% 16 33
audit/management/commands/load_fixtures.py 46% 39-45
audit/viewlib/submission_progress_view.py 89% 111 171-172
audit/viewlib/tribal_data_consent.py 34% 23-41 44-79
audit/viewlib/unlock_after_certification.py 57% 28-47 69-83
audit/viewlib/upload_report_view.py 26% 32-35 44 91-117 120-170 178-209
cms/views.py 57% 11-16 29-30
config/urls.py 71% 81
dissemination/models.py 99% 460
dissemination/search.py 85% 41-43
dissemination/views.py 70% 24-26 29-58 136-145
dissemination/migrations/0002_general_fac_accepted_date.py 47% 10-12
djangooidc/backends.py 78% 32 57-63
djangooidc/exceptions.py 66% 19 21 23 28
djangooidc/oidc.py 16% 32-35 45-51 64-70 92-149 153-199 203-226 230-275 280-281 286
djangooidc/views.py 80% 22 43 114
djangooidc/tests/common.py 96%
report_submission/forms.py 92% 35
report_submission/views.py 76% 83 215-216 218 240-241 260-261 287-396 399-409
report_submission/templatetags/get_attr.py 76% 8 11-14 18
support/admin.py 88% 76 79 84 91-97 100-102
support/cog_over.py 90% 30-33 86 93 145
support/signals.py 66% 23-24 33-34
support/test_cog_over.py 98% 134-135 224
support/management/commands/seed_cog_baseline.py 98% 20-21
tools/update_program_data.py 89% 96
users/auth.py 95% 40-41
users/models.py 97% 51-52
users/fixtures/user_fixtures.py 91%

Minimum allowed coverage is 85%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against b45fbf9

@tadhg-ohiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Apparently we weren't using baker heavily enough to need to bring it in, closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant