Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document cg-egress-proxy controls within an OSCAL component definition #75

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Document cg-egress-proxy controls within an OSCAL component definition #75

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

rahearn
Copy link
Contributor

@rahearn rahearn commented Oct 3, 2024

Adds a trestle documentation directory to edit and distribute the OSCAL component definition alongside cg-egress-proxy

@rahearn rahearn marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 14:57
@rahearn rahearn requested a review from a team October 3, 2024 14:57
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

OSCAL assembly detected changes that aren't checked in.

Run bin/assemble-cgep-json within trestle to ensure markdown changes are reflected in the CD

@rahearn rahearn self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
pauldoomgov
pauldoomgov approved these changes Oct 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@pauldoomgov pauldoomgov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Bonus points for referencing the external 800-53r5 json to save space!

@rahearn rahearn merged commit f2325db into main Oct 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@rahearn rahearn deleted the oscal-component-definition branch October 3, 2024 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pauldoomgov pauldoomgov pauldoomgov approved these changes

Assignees

@rahearn rahearn

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rahearn @pauldoomgov