Evaluation Form: Scale Type

[r-bartlett-gsa]

User story

As a challenge manager, in order to create fair and accurate scoring form, I would like to have an option to either apply weights to criteria scores or to use point scale.

Acceptance criteria:

• A challenge manager can indicate if they want to use Point Scale or Weighted Scale for their evaluation form
• When "weighted scale" option is selected:
  • Criteria Points / Weight field value is used as a weight value for the criteria (Evaluation Score Calculation #71 )
  • When a challenge manager saves the form, the system validates if inputted weights for all criteria add up to 100%
    • If a total weight for all criteria is not 100%, a form an error message is displayed
• When "point scale" option is selected:
  • Criteria Points / Weight field value is used to indicate the max score value for the criteria (Evaluation Score Calculation #71 )
  • Criteria point values for all criteria can add up to any value

Development tasks:

• Task 1
• Task 2

Definition of Done

Doing (dev team)

• Code complete
• Code is organized appropriately
• Any known trade offs are documented in the associated GH issue
• Code is documented, modules, shared functions, etc.
• Automated testing has been added or updated in response to changes in this PR
• The feature is smoke tested to confirm it meets requirements
• Database changes have been peer reviewed for index changes and performance bottlenecks
• PR that changes or adds UI
  • include a screenshot of the WAVE report for the altered pages
  • Confirm changes were validated for mobile responsiveness
• PR approved / Peer reviewed
• Security scans passed
• Automate accessibility tests passed
• Build process and deployment is automated and repeatable
• Feature toggles if appropriate
• Deploy to staging
• Move card to testing column in the board

---

Staging

• Usability testing: mobile and desktop (Tracy or Marni)
• Accessibility tested (Marni)
  • Keyboard navigation
  • Focus confirmed
  • Color contrast compliance
  • Screen reader testing
• Cross browser testing - UI rendering is performant on below listed devices/browsers (Tracy or Marni)
  • Windows/Chrome
  • Windows/Edge
  • Mac/Chrome
  • Mac/Safari
  • iOS/Safari
• AC review (Renata)
• Deploy to production (production-like environment for eval capability) (dev team)
• Move to production column in the board

---

Production

• User and security documentation has been reviewed for necessary updates (Renata/Tracy/Dev team)
• PO / PM approved (Jarah or Renata)
• AC is met and it works as expected (Jarah or Renata)
• Move to done column in the board (Jarah or Renata)

[r-bartlett-gsa]

[r-bartlett-gsa]

Moving user feedback from #61 to this appropriate user story:

• None of Scale Type options should be selected by default

[mhotch24]

@r-bartlett-gsa @TCKapGrp
A11y and Cross Browser testing completed and passed.

[TCKapGrp]

@r-bartlett-gsa

QA Feedback:
1 - You can type a very large number into the criteria points per the AC but if you only see the first four characters. If a person does a copy and paste a few times or some other error in typing, there is no way to validate the data.

2 - I typed in a VERY long string of numbers: 192222900000000000000222222020202020202020202020200202020202020200202020202020

and when saving got this error:

when I changed it to "20" no error was recorded.

[r-bartlett-gsa]

@stepchud Please address the following feedback:

• None of Scale Type options should be selected by default
• Limit criteria points / weight field input to 4 characters / digits => moved to Evaluation Form: Limit criteria points / weight field input to 4 digits #275